Erdős problem 160
On Mathoverflow user leechlattice shows that .
Sources
FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/
160.lean
Retained formal statement
The observation of Zachary Hunter in that question coupled with the bounds of Kelley-Meka KeMe23 imply that for some .
∃ c > 0, (fun n => Real.exp (c * Real.log ↑n ^ (1 / 12))) =O[Filter.atTop] fun n => ↑(Erdos160.erdos_160.h n)SolvedStatement only, no proof