Erdős problem 200
Does the longest arithmetic progression of primes in have length ?
Sources
FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/
200.lean
Retained formal statement
It follows from the prime number theorem that such a progression has length .
∃ o, ∃ (_ : o =o[Filter.atTop] 1), ∀ (n : ℕ), ↑(Erdos200.longestPrimeArithmeticProgressions n) ≤ (1 + o n) * Real.log ↑nSolvedStatement only, no proof