Skip to content

Erdős problem 333

Let A⊆NA\subseteq \mathbb{N} be a set of density zero. Does there exist a BB such that A⊆B+BA\subseteq B+B and ∣B∩{1,…,N}∣=o(N1/2)\lvert B\cap \{1,\ldots,N\}\rvert =o(N^{1/2}) for all large NN?

Sources

The source's own material, retained exactly.

1 retained statement36c6d0fef71a

Open selected source

FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/

333.lean

Retained formal statement1 of 1

Let A⊆NA\subseteq \mathbb{N} be a set of density zero. Does there exist a BB such that A⊆B+BA\subseteq B+B and ∣B∩{1,…,N}∣=o(N1/2)\lvert B\cap \{1,\ldots,N\}\rvert =o(N^{1/2}) for all large NN?

The answer is no. Erdős and Newman [ErNe77] have proved this is true when AA is the set of squares. In fact, Theorem 2 of [ErNe77] already implies a negative answer to this problem, but this seems to have been overlooked by Erdős and Graham.

See also [806].

FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/333.leanErdos333.erdos_3332 linesExact file
False ↔  ∀ (A : Set ℕ), A.HasDensity 0 → ∃ B, A ⊆ B + B ∧ (fun N => ↑(B ∩ Set.Icc 1 N).ncard) =o[Filter.atTop] fun N => √↑N
SolvedProof has a holelean4external proof

The proof uses `sorry`: part of the argument is written but not proved. Lean accepts the file; it does not accept the theorem.