Skip to content

Erdős problem 337

Let A⊆NA\subseteq \mathbb{N} be an additive basis (of any finite order) such that ∣A∩{1,…,N}∣=o(N)\lvert A\cap \{1,\ldots,N\}\rvert=o(N). Is it true that lim⁡N→∞∣(A+A)∩{1,…,N}∣∣A∩{1,…,N}∣=∞? \lim_{N\to \infty}\frac{\lvert (A+A)\cap \{1,\ldots,N\}\rvert} {\lvert A\cap \{1,\ldots,N\}\rvert}=\infty?

Sources

The source's own material, retained exactly.

4 retained statements36c6d0fef71a

Open selected source

FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/

337.lean

Retained formal statement1 of 4

Let A⊆NA\subseteq \mathbb{N} be an additive basis (of any finite order) such that ∣A∩{1,…,N}∣=o(N)\lvert A\cap \{1,\ldots,N\}\rvert=o(N). Is it true that lim⁡N→∞∣(A+A)∩{1,…,N}∣∣A∩{1,…,N}∣=∞? \lim_{N\to \infty}\frac{\lvert (A+A)\cap \{1,\ldots,N\}\rvert} {\lvert A\cap \{1,\ldots,N\}\rvert}=\infty?

The answer is no, and a counterexample was provided by Turjányi [Tu84]. This was generalised (to the replacement of A+AA+A by the hh-fold sumset hAhA for any h≥2h\geq 2) by Ruzsa and Turjányi [RT85].

"Additive basis" is Set.IsAsymptoticAddBasis: some finite hh has hAhA containing every sufficiently large integer. The exact notion Set.IsAddBasis, which asks that hAhA be all of N\mathbb{N}, would force 0,1∈A0, 1 \in A and is not the class these results are about.

The linked file states the basis hypothesis as ∃ N₀, Set.Ici N₀ ⊆ iterated_sumset A k and indexes both counting functions by a real xx through ⌊x⌋\lfloor x\rfloor, where the counting functions here are indexed by N:NN : \mathbb{N}.

FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/337.leanErdos337.erdos_3375 linesExact file
False ↔  ∀ (A : Set ℕ),    A.IsAsymptoticAddBasis →      ((fun N => ↑(A ∩ Set.Icc 1 N).ncard) =o[Filter.atTop] fun N => ↑N) →        Filter.Tendsto (fun N => ↑((A + A) ∩ Set.Icc 1 N).ncard / ↑(A ∩ Set.Icc 1 N).ncard) Filter.atTop Filter.atTop
SolvedProof has a holelean4external proof

The proof uses `sorry`: part of the argument is written but not proved. Lean accepts the file; it does not accept the theorem.