Skip to content

Erdős problem 501

For every xRx \in \mathbb{R} let AxRA_x \subset \mathbb{R} be a bounded set of Lebesgue outer measure <1< 1. Must there be an infinite independent set, that is an infinite XRX \subseteq \mathbb{R} with xAyx \notin A_y for all distinct x,yXx, y \in X?

Sources

Browse retained paths and inspect the exact material available for this Problem.

14 retained statements2415f78e850a

Open selected source

FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/

501.lean

Retained formal statement2 of 13

The constant family A x = ∅ satisfies all hypotheses of the main problem: each A x is bounded (the empty set is bounded) and has Lebesgue outer measure 0 < 1. Moreover, all of ℝ is an independent set, showing the conclusion holds trivially.

This demonstrates that the hypotheses are non-vacuous: the family A x = ∅ is a valid input to the theorem, and (which is infinite) witnesses the conclusion.

FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/501.leanErdos501.erdos_501.tests.empty_family_is_valid3 linesExact file
have A := fun x => ∅;(∀ (x : ℝ), Bornology.IsBounded (A x)) ∧  (∀ (x : ℝ), MeasureTheory.volume.toOuterMeasure (A x) < 1) ∧ ∃ X, X.InfiniteX.Pairwise fun x y => xA y
TestStatement only, no proof

Search problems.science

Find a Problem, Result, source, or page