Skip to content

Erdős problem 501

For every xRx \in \mathbb{R} let AxRA_x \subset \mathbb{R} be a bounded set of Lebesgue outer measure <1< 1. Must there be an infinite independent set, that is an infinite XRX \subseteq \mathbb{R} with xAyx \notin A_y for all distinct x,yXx, y \in X?

Sources

Browse retained paths and inspect the exact material available for this Problem.

14 retained statements2415f78e850a

Open selected source

FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/

501.lean

Retained formal statement7 of 13

Closed sets case: existence of an independent set of size 3.

If the sets A x are closed with Lebesgue measure < 1, must there exist an independent set of size 3?

This is implied by the stronger theorem of Newelski–Pawlikowski–Seredyński [NPS87] below; Gladysz [Gl62] earlier proved the existence of an independent set of size 2.

FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/501.leanErdos501.erdos_501.variants.closed_size34 linesExact file
True  ∀ (A : ℝ → Set ℝ),    (∀ (x : ℝ), IsClosed (A x)) →      (∀ (x : ℝ), MeasureTheory.volume (A x) < 1) → ∃ X, 3 ≤ X.ncardX.Pairwise fun x y => xA y
SolvedStatement only, no proof

Search problems.science

Find a Problem, Result, source, or page