Skip to content

Erdős problem 501

For every x∈Rx \in \mathbb{R} let Ax⊂RA_x \subset \mathbb{R} be a bounded set of Lebesgue outer measure <1< 1. Must there be an infinite independent set, that is an infinite X⊆RX \subseteq \mathbb{R} with x∉Ayx \notin A_y for all distinct x,y∈Xx, y \in X?

Sources

The source's own material, retained exactly.

14 retained statements36c6d0fef71a

Open selected source

Retained excerpts/

VibeMathed

Retained source excerpt1 of 1

For every $x \in \mathbb{R}$ let $A_x \subset \mathbb{R}$ be a bounded set of Lebesgue outer measure $< 1$. Must there be an infinite independent set, that is an infinite $X \subseteq \mathbb{R}$ with $x \notin A_y$ for all distinct $x, y \in X$? Erdős and Hajnal proved that arbitrarily large finite independent sets exist. Hechler showed in 1972 that the answer is no under the continuum hypothesis, so any positive answer had to come from a model where CH fails, and Sungchul Lee later derived one from a real-valued measurable cardinal. The answer is that neither side is provable. Dropping Lee's large cardinal by transferring his argument to the extension of a model of CH by random reals gives a model where the answer is yes; Hechler's construction gives one where it is no. The question is independent of ZFC.

Open exact source location