Vela Mathematics Program: problems

Narrowed toformalized ×source:formal-conjectures ×Clear all

Problem ledger

604 problems · 7/13Number SourcesGraph view

declared open · formalizederdos:495

True ↔ ∀ (α β : ℝ), Filter.liminf (fun n => ↑n * distToNearestInt (↑n * α) * distToNearestInt (↑n * β)) Filter.atTop = 0

diophantine approximationnumber theoryN/A2 sources

declared solved (Lean) · formalizederdos:497

∃ o, ∃ (_ : o =o[Filter.atTop] 1), ∀ (n : ℕ), ↑(DedekindNumber.M' n) = 2 ^ ((1 + o n) * ↑(n.choose (n / 2)))

combinatoricsA0003725 sources

declared proved (Lean) · formalizederdos:498

True ↔ ∀ (n : ℕ) (z : Fin n → ℂ), (∀ (i : Fin n), 1 ≤ ‖z i‖) → ∀ (c : ℂ), {ε | (∀ (i : Fin n), ε i = -1 ∨ ε i = 1) ∧ ∑ i, ↑(ε i) * z i ∈ Metric.ball c 1}.ncard ≤ n.choose (n / 2)

combinatoricsanalysisN/A5 sources

declared proved (Lean) · formalizederdos:499

True ↔ ∀ (n : ℕ), ∀ M ∈ doublyStochastic ℝ (Fin n), ∃ σ, ↑n ^ (-↑n) ≤ ∏ i, M i (σ i)

combinatoricsN/A5 sources

declared open · formalizederdos:501

For every

x \in \mathbb{R}

let

A_x \subset \mathbb{R}

be a bounded set of Lebesgue outer measure

< 1

. Must there be an infinite independent set, that is an infinite

X \subseteq \mathbb{R}

with

x \notin A_y

for all distinct

x, y \in X

? Erdős and Hajnal proved that arbitrarily large finite independent sets exist. Hechler showed in 1972 that the answer is no under the continuum hypothesis, so any positive answer had to come from a model where CH fails, and Sungchul Lee later derived one from a real-valued measurable cardinal. The answer is that neither side is provable. Dropping Lee's large cardinal by transferring his argument to the extension of a model of CH by random reals gives a model where the answer is yes; Hechler's construction gives one where it is no. The question is independent of ZFC.

combinatoricsset theoryN/A4 sources

declared solved (Lean) · formalizederdos:502

∀ (n : ℕ) (A : Set (EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n))), A.Finite → {d | ∃ x ∈ A, ∃ y ∈ A, x ≠ y ∧ dist x y = d}.ncard = 2 → A.ncard ≤ (n + 2).choose 2

geometrydistancesA0276275 sources

declared open · formalizederdos:503

∀ (n : ℕ), IsGreatest {x | ∃ A, ∃ (_ : A.IsIsosceles), A.ncard = x} sorry

geometrydistancesA1757693 sources

declared disproved (Lean) · formalizederdos:505

∃ n S, Bornology.IsBounded S ∧ 0 < Metric.diam S ∧ ∀ (F : Fin (n + 1) → Set (EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n))), S ⊆ ⋃ i, F i → ∃ i, Metric.diam S ≤ Metric.diam (F i)

geometrypossible5 sources

declared open · formalizederdos:507

Asymptotics.IsEquivalent Filter.atTop Erdos507.α sorry

geometryN/A3 sources

declared open · formalizederdos:508

4 ≤ (SimpleGraph.UnitDistancePlaneGraph Set.univ).chromaticNumber

geometryramsey theoryN/A2 sources

declared open · formalizederdos:509

∀ {M : Type u} [inst : MetricSpace M] (S : Set M), S.Nonempty → ∀ (r : ℝ) (ι : Type v) (bdc : Erdos509.BoundedDiscCover S r ι), 0 < r

analysisN/A2 sources

declared open · formalizederdos:510

sorry ↔ ∃ c, ∃ (_ : 0 < c), ∀ᶠ (N : ℕ) in Filter.atTop, ∀ (A : Finset ℕ), 0 ∉ A → A.card = N → ∃ θ, ∑ n ∈ A, Real.cos (↑n * θ) < -c * √↑N

analysisN/A2 sources

declared proved (Lean) · formalizederdos:512

True ↔ ∃ c > 0, ∀ (N : ℕ) (A : Finset ℤ), A.card = N → c * Real.log ↑N ≤ ∫ (θ : ℝ) in 0..1, ‖∑ n ∈ A, additiveChar (↑n * θ)‖

analysisN/A4 sources

declared open · formalizederdos:513

sorry = ⨆ f, Filter.liminf (fun r => Erdos513.ratio r ↑f) Filter.atTop

analysisN/A3 sources

declared proved · formalizederdos:516

∀ {f : ℂ → ℂ} {n : ℕ → ℕ}, HasFabryGaps n → ∀ {a : ℕ → ℂ}, (∀ (n : ℕ), a n ≠ 0) → (∀ (z : ℂ), HasSum (fun k => a k * z ^ n k) (f z)) → Erdos516.OfFiniteOrder f → Filter.limsup (fun r => Erdos516.ratio r f) Filter.atTop = 1

analysisN/A2 sources

declared open · formalizederdos:517

sorry ↔ ∀ {f : ℂ → ℂ} {n : ℕ → ℕ}, HasFabryGaps n → ∀ {a : ℕ → ℂ}, (∀ (k : ℕ), a k ≠ 0) → (∀ (z : ℂ), HasSum (fun k => a k * z ^ n k) (f z)) → ∀ (z : ℂ), {x | f x = z}.Infinite

analysisN/A3 sources

declared proved (Lean) · formalizederdos:519

True ↔ ∃ c, 0 < c ∧ ∀ (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) (z : Fin n → ℂ), z ⟨0, hn⟩ = 1 → ∃ k, c < ‖Erdos519.powerSum z (↑k + 1)‖

analysisN/A5 sources

declared open · formalizederdos:520

True ↔ ∃ c > 0, ∀ (Ω : Type) [inst : MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace Ω] [MeasureTheory.IsProbabilityMeasure MeasureTheory.volume] (f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ), Erdos520.IsRademacherMultiplicative f → ∀ᵐ (ω : Ω), Filter.limsup (fun N => ∑ m ∈ Finset.Iic N, f m ω / √(↑N * Real.log (Real.log ↑N))) Filter.atTop = c

number theoryprobabilityN/A2 sources

declared open · formalizederdos:521

False ↔ Erdos521.Claim

analysispolynomialsprobabilityN/A4 sources

declared open · formalizederdos:522

For

P_n(z) = \sum_{k=0}^n \varepsilon_k z^k

with independent uniform signs, does the number

R_n

of roots in

|z| \le 1

satisfy

R_n/(n/2) \to 1

almost surely? The manuscript proves the strong law with

R_n = n/2 + O_\omega(n^{149/150})

analysispolynomialsprobabilityN/A4 sources

declared proved (Lean) · formalizederdos:532

True ↔ ∀ (c : ℕ → Fin 2), ∃ A, A.Infinite ∧ ∃ color, ∀ (S : Finset ℕ), S.Nonempty → ↑S ⊆ A → c (∑ n ∈ S, n) = color

number theoryramsey theoryN/A4 sources

declared disproved · formalizederdos:533

False ↔ ∀ (δ : ℝ), 0 < δ → ∃ c, 0 < c ∧ ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in Filter.atTop, ∀ (G : SimpleGraph (Fin n)), G.CliqueFree 5 → δ * ↑n ^ 2 ≤ ↑G.edgeFinset.card → ∃ S, c * ↑n ≤ ↑S.card ∧ G.CliqueFreeOn (↑S) 3

graph theoryN/A3 sources

declared open · formalizederdos:535

∀ r ≥ 3, ∃ c > 0, ∀ᶠ (N : ℕ) in Filter.atTop, ↑(Erdos535.f r N) ≤ ↑N ^ (c / Real.log (Real.log ↑N))

number theorypossible3 sources

declared open · formalizederdos:536

True ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ (N : ℕ) in Filter.atTop, ∀ A ⊆ Finset.Icc 1 N, ε * ↑N ≤ ↑A.card → ∃ a ∈ A, ∃ b ∈ A, ∃ c ∈ A, {a, b, c}.card = 3 ∧ a.lcm b = b.lcm c ∧ b.lcm c = a.lcm c

number theorypossible3 sources

declared disproved (Lean) · formalizederdos:537

False ↔ ∀ (ε : ℝ), 0 < ε → ∀ᶠ (N : ℕ) in Filter.atTop, ∀ A ⊆ Finset.Icc 1 N, ↑A.card ≥ ε * ↑N → ∃ a₁ ∈ A, ∃ a₂ ∈ A, ∃ a₃ ∈ A, ∃ p₁ p₂ p₃, Nat.Prime p₁ ∧ Nat.Prime p₂ ∧ Nat.Prime p₃ ∧ p₁ ≠ p₂ ∧ p₁ ≠ p₃ ∧ p₂ ≠ p₃ ∧ a₁ * p₁ = a₂ * p₂ ∧ a₂ * p₂ = a₃ * p₃

number theorypossible5 sources

declared open · formalizederdos:538

If each integer has at most

r

representations

m = pa

with

p

prime and

a \in A \subseteq [1, N]

, what is the best upper bound for

\sum_{a \in A} 1/a

? The candidate proof gives the matching order

\Theta_r(\log N / \log\log N)

number theoryN/A5 sources

declared open · formalizederdos:539

For

|A| = n

, how small can the cofactor set

Q(A) = \{a / \gcd(a,b) : a, b \in A\}

be? The answer is

h(n) = n^{1/2 + o(1)}

: a new upper bound

h(n) \le n^{1/2} \exp(O(\sqrt{\log n}))

matches the classical lower bound.

number theorypossible5 sources

declared proved (Lean) · formalizederdos:540

True ↔ ∃ C, 0 < C ∧ ∀ (N : ℕ), 0 < N → ∀ (A : Finset (ZMod N)), C * √↑N ≤ ↑A.card → Erdos540.HasZeroSubsetSum A

number theoryA0344635 sources

declared proved (Lean) · formalizederdos:541

True ↔ ∀ (p : ℕ), Fact (Nat.Prime p) → ∀ (a : Fin p → ZMod p), (∃ r, ∀ (S : Finset (Fin p)), S ≠ ∅ → ∑ i ∈ S, a i = 0 → S.card = r) → (Set.range a).ncard ≤ 2

number theoryN/A5 sources

declared open · formalizederdos:562

True ↔ ∀ r ≥ 3, (fun n => Real.log^[r - 1] ↑(Combinatorics.hypergraphRamsey r n)) =Θ[Filter.atTop] fun n => ↑n

graph theoryramsey theoryhypergraphspossible2 sources

declared open · formalized · $500erdos:564

True ↔ ∃ c > 0, ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in Filter.atTop, 2 ^ 2 ^ (c * n) ≤ ↑(Combinatorics.hypergraphRamsey 3 n)

graph theoryramsey theoryhypergraphspossible2 sources

declared open · formalizederdos:566

True ↔ ∀ (p : ℕ) (G : SimpleGraph (Fin p)), (∀ (S : Finset (Fin p)), 2 ≤ S.card → (SimpleGraph.induce (↑S) G).edgeSet.ncard ≤ 2 * S.card - 3) → ∃ c > 0, ∀ (n : ℕ) (H : SimpleGraph (Fin n)) [inst : DecidableRel H.Adj], (∀ (v : Fin n), 0 < H.degree v) → ↑(G.sizeRamsey H) ≤ c * ↑H.edgeSet.ncard

graph theoryramsey theoryN/A2 sources

declared open · formalizederdos:567

True ↔ Erdos567.Q3.IsRamseySizeLinear

graph theoryramsey theoryN/A2 sources

declared open · formalizederdos:579

True ↔ ∀ (δ : ℝ), 0 < δ → ∃ c, 0 < c ∧ ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in Filter.atTop, ∀ (G : SimpleGraph (Fin n)), Erdos579.octahedron.Free G → δ * ↑n ^ 2 ≤ ↑G.edgeFinset.card → c * ↑n ≤ ↑G.indepNum

graph theoryturan numberN/A2 sources

declared proved (Lean) · formalized · $100erdos:582

True ↔ ∃ V x G, G.CliqueFree 4 ∧ Erdos582.EdgeRamseyTriangle G

graph theoryramsey theoryN/A5 sources

declared solved · formalizederdos:587

∃ O > 0, ∃ O' > 0, ∀ᶠ (N : ℕ) in Filter.atTop, ↑(Erdos587.MaxNotSqSum N) ≤ O' * Real.nthRoot 3 ↑N * Real.log ↑N ^ O

number theoryA3720402 sources

declared proved · formalized · $250erdos:590

OrdinalCardinalRamsey (Ordinal.omega0 ^ Ordinal.omega0) (Ordinal.omega0 ^ Ordinal.omega0) 3

set theoryramsey theoryN/A2 sources

declared proved · formalized · $250erdos:591

True ↔ OrdinalCardinalRamsey (Ordinal.omega0 ^ Ordinal.omega0 ^ 2) (Ordinal.omega0 ^ Ordinal.omega0 ^ 2) 3

set theoryramsey theoryN/A3 sources

declared open · formalized · $1000erdos:592

∀ (β : Ordinal.{u}), β.card ≤ Cardinal.aleph0 → OrdinalCardinalRamsey (Ordinal.omega0 ^ β) (Ordinal.omega0 ^ β) 3 ↔ sorry β

set theoryramsey theoryN/A2 sources

declared open · formalized · $500erdos:593

Which finite triple systems occur in every triple system of uncountable chromatic number? The claimed characterization: exactly those that, after removing isolated vertices, are linear, have every hyperedge-node of their Levi graph meeting a bridge, and have every Berge cycle even.

set theorygraph theoryhypergraphsN/A4 sources

declared proved · formalizederdos:594

True ↔ ∀ (V : Type) (G : SimpleGraph V), IsEmpty (G.Coloring ℕ) → ∃ N, ∀ (k : ℕ), N ≤ k → ∃ v w, w.IsCycle ∧ w.length = 2 * k + 1

graph theoryset theoryN/A2 sources

declared open · formalized · $250erdos:595

True ↔ ∃ V, ∃ (_ : Infinite V), ∃ G, G.CliqueFree 4 ∧ ¬Erdos595.IsCountableUnionOfTriangleFree G

graph theoryset theoryN/A2 sources

declared open · formalizederdos:596

∀ {U₁ U₂ : Type} (G₁ : SimpleGraph U₁) (G₂ : SimpleGraph U₂), G₁.IsErdosHajnalExceptional G₂ ↔ (fun {U₁ U₂} => sorry) G₁ G₂

graph theoryramsey theoryset theoryN/A2 sources

declared open · formalizederdos:598

∀ (m : Type u_1) [Infinite m], True ↔ ∃ c, ∀ (X : Set m), Cardinal.mk ↑X = Erdos598.κ → c '' {s | ↑s ⊆ X} = Set.univ

set theoryramsey theoryN/A3 sources

declared proved · formalizederdos:599

True ↔ ∀ (V : Type) (G : SimpleGraph V) (A B : Set V), Disjoint A B → G.IsIndepSet A → G.IsIndepSet B → ∃ ι a b p S, (∀ (i : ι), a i ∈ A) ∧ (∀ (i : ι), b i ∈ B) ∧ (∀ (i : ι), (p i).IsPath) ∧ (Pairwise fun i j => Disjoint {v | v ∈ (p i).support} {v | v ∈ (p j).support}) ∧ S ⊆ {v | ∃ i, v ∈ (p i).support} ∧ (∀ (i : ι), ∃! v, v ∈ S ∧ v ∈ (p i).support) ∧ ∀ a' ∈ A, ∀ b' ∈ B, ∀ (q : G.Walk a' b'), q.IsPath → ∃ v ∈ q.support, v ∈ S

graph theoryset theoryN/A2 sources

declared open · formalizederdos:600

True ↔ ∀ (r : ℕ), 2 ≤ r → Filter.Tendsto (fun n => ↑(Erdos600.eFunction n (r + 1)) - ↑(Erdos600.eFunction n r)) Filter.atTop Filter.atTop

graph theorypossible2 sources

declared open · formalizederdos:602

¬Erdos602.disjoint_without_infinite_claim

combinatoricsset theoryN/A3 sources

declared disproved (Lean) · formalizederdos:613

False ↔ ∀ n ≥ 3, ∀ (V : Type u_1) [inst : Fintype V] (G : SimpleGraph V) [inst_1 : DecidableRel G.Adj], G.edgeFinset.card = (2 * n + 1).choose 2 - n.choose 2 - 1 → ∃ B D, ∀ [DecidableRel B.Adj] [inst_3 : DecidableRel D.Adj], G = B ⊔ D ∧ B.IsBipartite ∧ ∀ (v : V), D.degree v < n

graph theoryN/A5 sources

declared disproved · formalizederdos:615

False ↔ ∃ c, 0 < c ∧ ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in Filter.atTop, ∀ (G : SimpleGraph (Fin n)), (1 / 8 - c) * ↑n ^ 2 ≤ ↑G.edgeFinset.card → ¬G.CliqueFree 4 ∨ ↑n / Real.log ↑n ≤ ↑G.indepNum

graph theoryramsey theorypossible2 sources

declared falsifiable · formalizederdos:617

∀ r ≥ 3, ∀ {V : Type} [inst : Fintype V] [DecidableEq V], Fintype.card V = r ^ 2 + 1 → ∀ (coloring : Sym2 V → Fin r), ∃ S k, S.card = r + 1 ∧ ∀ u ∈ S, ∀ v ∈ S, u ≠ v → coloring s(u, v) ≠ k

graph theoryN/A2 sources

Problems · Vela Mathematics Program

Problem ledger

Search problems.science