Skip to content

Erdős problem 56

Suppose A⊆{1,…,N}A \subseteq \{1,\dots,N\} is such that there are no k+1k+1 elements of AA which are relatively prime. An example is the set of all multiples of the first kk primes. Is this the largest such set? To avoid trivial counterexamples, we must insist that NN be at least the kkth prime.

Erdős Problems records this as disproved (Lean).

No Repository has ruled on it here.

How far the record reaches4 of 6 stages
  1. Sourceerdos-problems
  2. StatementRetained
  3. Formal11 retained
  4. Resolutiondisproved (Lean)
  5. WorkNone recorded
  6. DecisionNone here
  7. The questionNot reached
What this record is missingWork

Nothing here has checked that finding.

Reproducing it here turns a report into evidence.

Where the source files it577 share a topic
Erdős problem 321accepted
Carrying a Standing. Browse the topic.