Skip to content

Erdős problem 785

Let A,BNA,B\subseteq \mathbb{N} be infinite sets such that A+BA+B contains all large integers. Let A(x)=A[1,x]A(x)=\lvert A\cap [1,x]\rvert and similarly for B(x)B(x). Is it true that if A(x)B(x)xA(x)B(x)\sim x then A(x)B(x)xA(x)B(x)-x\to \infty as xx\to \infty?

Sources

Browse retained paths and inspect the exact material available for this Problem.

10 retained statements2415f78e850a

Open selected source

FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/

785.lean

Retained formal statement7 of 10

Narkiewicz [Na59] proved that, under the given assumptions (and perhaps swapping AA and BB) we must have A(2x)/A(x)1A(2x)/A(x)\to 1 and B(2x)/B(x)2B(2x)/B(x)\to 2.

FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/785.leanErdos785.erdos_785.variants.narkiewicz8 linesExact file
∀ (A B : Set ℕ),  A.Infinite    B.Infinite      Erdos785.IsExactAdditiveComplement A B        Filter.Tendsto (fun x => ↑(Erdos785.counting A (2 * x)) / ↑(Erdos785.counting A x)) Filter.atTop (nhds 1) ∧            Filter.Tendsto (fun x => ↑(Erdos785.counting B (2 * x)) / ↑(Erdos785.counting B x)) Filter.atTop (nhds 2) ∨          Filter.Tendsto (fun x => ↑(Erdos785.counting B (2 * x)) / ↑(Erdos785.counting B x)) Filter.atTop (nhds 1) ∧            Filter.Tendsto (fun x => ↑(Erdos785.counting A (2 * x)) / ↑(Erdos785.counting A x)) Filter.atTop (nhds 2)
SolvedStatement only, no proof

Search problems.science

Find a Problem, Result, source, or page